An astonishing, chilling tale of power, and how you're being abused and killed by those who claim it

As the biden regime continues to DEMAND that every American take the jab (while continuing to allow hundreds of thousands of illegals into the U.S. interior without even testing them for the virus, let alone forcing THEM to take the jab) I'm reminded of a novel written 72 years ago that forecast a lot of the techniques we're seeing.

George Orwell wrote his dark, dystopian novel "1984" in 1949.  It describes a society in which the government runs everything with an iron fist.  Government minders watch citizens everywhere, including through their televisions, and use cunning propaganda to manipulate the way citizens think.

Sound familiar?

Orwell was familiar with the communist tactic of re-defining words so they no longer had their original meaning--and often had exactly the opposite meaning from the original.  Thus we have the 3 classic paradoxical phrases,
   WAR IS PEACE
   FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
   IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH  

Rational people (i.e. non-communists) immediately see these phrases as nonsense, but little by little as the novel progresses, Orwell shows how, under the all-powerful regime, they can be shown to make a kind of sense.  For example, "freedom" offers an infinite number of choices.  People who make poor choices suffer from those choices.

People confronted with an infinite number of choices every day will inevitably make a few wrong ones.  Since no rational person wants to suffer, the regime teaches that fear of making a poor choice is ultimately paralyzing, debilitating.  Hence freedom actually ends up being crippling--a kind of slavery.

Once that line of reasoning is accepted (and the schools ensure that it is), the logical step for a compassionate, caring government is to limit the number of choices citizens can make.  See?  Compassionate.  Caring.  Better.

A key part of "education" in the regime is a thing called "doublethink," which is the ability of a person to hold two contradictory thoughts at once without being troubled by the contradiction--indeed, without even noticing it.  So for example, today most people realize that individuals shouldn't spend money they don't have.  But for some reason it's fine for the government to spend vastly more than it takes in each year.  

Indeed, anyone who even *suggests* that the government reduce the amount it has to borrow every year to fund all its programs is immediately shouted down by the "elites," condemned as "heartless," "raaacist" and uncaring.

Essentially, "doublethink" allowed the Party to say contradictory things in the same week, but the public would fully accept, believe, and embrace both statements.  Cool!

Another key to the regime's control was its apparent ability to alter the past.

At first glance that would seem impossible.  After all, the past has already happened, right?  How could something that already happened possibly be changed?

Easier than you might think.  The regime recognizes that most people have a very shaky memory of past events.  Unless it's their own birthday or similar personal info, most people depend on Google to tell 'em what happened a decade or more ago, eh?  In Orwell's time the equivalent was old newspapers or magazine articles.

So the regime has an entire cabinet-level agency charged with the task of combing through old newspapers and magazines and cutting out any article that would show that any statement or prediction made by the regime turned out to be wrong.

In a classic example of Newspeak, that agency is called the Ministry of Truth.  (Orwell was a Brit, so they called cabinet-level agencies "Ministries."  In the U.S. we'd call it the Department of Truth.)

From 1920 to 1944 the former Soviet Union was notorious for announcing "five-year plans," establishing gloriously large goals for the production of virtually everything.  At the end of the five years the ruling communist party would announce that because of the wonders of communism and the extraordinary sacrifice of devoted communist workers, every goal had been surpassed--even though that was always a complete lie.

The regime recognized that by altering the historical record you made "memories" suspect, which effectively altered the past.  Thus whoever controlled the present could also "control" the past, and that controlling the past would allow you to control the future.  Interesting.  And true.

Example:  Lord Fauxi and the rest of the government rulers demand that you wear a mask or two, to reduce the spread of duh virus.  But early on, did Fauxi ever say masks were useless in reducing the spread of covid?  You may think you heard him say that in March of 2020, but if there's no record of it, how can you convince others that you're right?

You can't, of course.

Welcome to Orwell's regime.

A common trait of dictatorial regimes, such as the communist and fascist countries of Orwell's time, was that the rulers pushed the idea that there was no such thing as objective truth.  If people believed that--and the schools ensured that they did--"Truth" then became whatever the Party said it was.

For example, in Orwell's novel the world is divided into three huge blocs.  The regime in which the novel is set--Oceania--has always been at war with "Eurasia" and allied with "Eastasia." There's a scene in the novel in which the speaker at a mass rally casually declares that Oceania is at war, not with Eurasia, but with Eastasia--which until that moment had been an ally of Oceania.  Certainly changing alliances are possible, but the kicker is that the speaker claims Oceania has *always* been at war with Eastasia.

This of course is the direct opposite of the truth, but within minutes all the "news" outlets are parroting the lie--and within hours most citizens are echoing the lie—apparently with no sense of discomfort or confusion.  Sort of the way most Americans reacted to Fauxi's contradictory statements about whether masks reduced the spread of duh Chyna virus.

An unspoken question in the novel is, why do the top rulers of the Party do all these things?  Do they really believe the bullshit they constantly spew?  You won't be a bit surprised to learn that it turns out they don't.  Instead the Party's sole motive is...power.  So let's look at that aspect for a minute:

If the biden regime can FORCE you and your kids to submit to the injection of a clearly non-vaccine shot, that has apparently killed tens of thousands of people worldwide, is there anything they couldn't do?  That's power.

Now: the only way they could do that, legally, was to give the vax "emergency use authorization" (EUA).  To do *that* they had to DECLARE as a statement of fact that there was no effective treatment for the disease.  Got that?

Now, many trials found that there are (and have always been) TWO effective treatments--which kills the entire EUA Narrative.  The CDC and FDA simply DECLARED that both were NOT effective.  They did this by lying about the studies, claiming they weren't controlled (i.e. didn't have a "control group"), or not large, or similar, even though those complaints were false.  And both the CDC and FDA refused to fund studies that would have satisfied their spurious objections.

But beginning in May of this year India experienced a huge surge in deaths--the "delta variant" of the Chinese virus.  Bodies were being left in the streets.  One region--the state of Uttar Pradesh, population 240 million or so--was particularly hard-hit.  So the World Health Organization--in cooperation with our CDC--rushed to field a program to test every household in that region.  And when someone tested positive, they left a "kit" containing...mystery stuff.

About all the information released to the public was that the kit cost about $2.  The contents remained a mystery--until about two weeks ago.

Uttar Pradesh has a low vax rate, and in May the number of deaths was running near ten-thousand per week.  But as the kits began to be distributed, cases plummeted.  In fact a month ago the province only had about 200 new cases of infection, while adjoining states still had about 30,000 new cases.  It was near-miraculous.

Finally, two weeks ago, it was revealed that the kits contained ten tablets of ivermectin, and a dozen tablets of an ordinary antibiotic.

Now this wasn't a formal study, but was nevertheless a HUGE trial, with tens of millions of subjects, and the results were clear and unambiguous: Ivermectin cures covid.  And it's crucial to note that our own CDC knew the contents of the kits before May.  So do ya think the CDC or FDA has finally reversed themselves, and are now recommending ivermectin to treat covid?

Not only no, but hell no:  Both the CDC and the FDA are STILL, to this day, barring hospitals from giving covid patients ivermectin.  So Americans continue to die, needlessly, even as citizens of India miraculously recover.

The CDC and FDA both KNOW ivermectin works.  They've known since July at the latest.  But they won't admit it works because it would mean admitting they lied earlier, which they will never do.

What IS that except "power for the sake of power," eh?